[Harp-L] Is this standard for SPAH?
- To: <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [Harp-L] Is this standard for SPAH?
- From: "Tom Stryker" <tstryker1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 07:18:32 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=XN6U0xrnzRkGltUbLR4d/1rJTKQu3vcMGw44KRptJ18=; b=ZOpyPgXU3RgLqA3n3XpF1VH6uZu7BquugACfuiHNqcAkrj6uBr1GlHipQYAn/Z8Z2T UbNkNJ3EX2p5jy+J1xoMrsPCdam2zCrFbuROgRBc2l7atz81bpvhx64tdHys1E7QFhYB CPZYh2RuCwt4G3wY8zCz0BeEqZIjgWiGH4umc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language; b=AQcyrrQqiVV4rEgVeoJVlns8RI/DEAjr6H3AWPHjxmjnNfqTvD09FRu8OdDfHpmoe8 J3lc7EyiXuwdz76wcQ7aMg2iRHT8QdKrqj23+9d/9BwUY+MWpqvzfSoq2NQESXnnRJXe E1FaNGrzh1VpyU+hMQaQ2fe0w3lSPvHFf1GK8=
- In-reply-to: <201009041120.o84BJxk5032356@harp-l.com>
- References: <201009041120.o84BJxk5032356@harp-l.com>
- Thread-index: ActMJN7CDYy2kfNpS4OucV8cSwL1YAAFYhqA
Mark, this should not be. My apology as SPAH has nothing if it does not
have members. Be assured I am following up on this.
Stryker
<Is this standard for SPAH?
attached below is a copy of an email I just sent
Mark
I'm still waiting patiently some 33 days.
On August 2nd I sent in membership and still
have not heard a thing on membership, I did get a message a couple weeks
ago stating sometime after the spah convention they will get to it, it is
now 14 days after the convention and have yet heard a thing. approaching
day
34 and getting very discouraged.
Regards
Mark>
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.